ILISU DAM and HEPP, THE SOUTHEASTERN
ANATOLIAN PROJECT (GAP):
Hydroelectric
Power Plant Developments in Turkey
and
Atatürk's Vision

Yuksel
OKTAY, PE
A ground breaking ceremony was held on August 5th at Ilisu, a small village along the Dicle
(Tigris) river where a large dam is to
be constructed soon. The Prime Minister,
who only two years ago had promised the
local people that he would not allow the
building of this dam, was the main speaker,
along with the Minister of Energy Dr.
Hilmi Guler, the Director of DSI, Mr.
Veysel Eroglu, and other dignitaries.
However, several local representatives
believe that the design must be altered
in order to save the historical town of
Hasankeyf (some refer to it as the city
of knowledge seeker) and many NGOs and
individuals believe that this is one project
that Turkey can not afford to be built
for many reasons. The project, which is
a part of the Southeastern Anatolia
Project (GAP) and, under study ever since
the State Hydraulics Works (DSI) was established
in 1954, will inundate 199 settlement
areas, including the 12,000 year old town
of Hasankeyf, forcing the relocation of close
to 44,000 people. Several bridges and stretches of roads, railways, transmission
lines will have to be relocated. This
is outlined in the preliminary Impact
Assesment Report,
which calls for many more detailed studies,
and yet the project was given the green
light, even without firm committed financial
resources, a must before mobilization
(1).
Mustafa Kemal Ataturk's
Vision
In 1929, Ataturk, who saw the need for the development
of hydroelectric power in Turkey, made
the following statement: "It is imperative
that the technical competence and capacity
of the General Directorate of State Hydraulics
Works, which is one of the main measures
taken for our economy, be firmly established."
Ataturk visited many sites around Turkey,
including the first dam built during the
Republican era, Cubuk Baraji near Ankara,
and in 1936 ordered the commencement of
studies on the Firat River basin (2).
However, if Ataturk was alive today, he
certainly would not be in favor of building
a series of dams on Munzur or Coruh which
will, when completed, eliminate the rivers.
It is nice to have and watch lakes and
grow fish in them, but there is nothing
in the world that makes human beings,
and wildlife too, more happy than running
water.
Ilšsu Dam and HEPP
The Ilšsu project, which is a part of the GAP and a must
for the construction of several other
dams and HEPPs on Dicle, has been dormant
since 2001 following the withdrawal of
several finacing and construction companies
involved in its development. Now a Turkish-led
consortium of German, Swiss and Austrian
companies have taken over the project.
When completed, it will be the the fourth
largest hydroelectric power plant in installed
capacity (1,200MW) and generation of electricity
(3.833 billion kWh). The total cost of
the project is estimated to be around
1.5 billion USD, including the expropriation
and resettlement costs of around $927
million, but excluding the financing cost.
During the financial arrangement period, DSI should look
at alternate designs, such as proposed
by a father and son team, Prof. Dr. Ilyas
Yilmazer of 100nci Yil University in Van
and Ozgur Yilmazer, eliminating the Ilšsu
dam and using penstocks to convey the
water to the powerhouse. Another design
recommends lowering the height of the
Ilšsu dam by 31 meters thus, completely
saving the town, which is being advocated
by the Parliament Deputy from Mardin,
Muharrem Dogan, as well, who claims that
the design proposed is the 1958 version,
which is hard to believe.
Hasankeyf, NGOs are Urging action to
Save the Town
Before the ground breaking ceremonies, civil groups in
the southeast protested the project which
will
flood the 12,000 year old Hasankeyf and many towns and
villages. One of the civil groups is the
"Initiative to Protect Hasankeyf Committee"
and represents civil society groups, local
administrators, bar associations, municipalities
and chambers of engineerig associations
with a call to everyone interested in
nature, cultural heritage and history.
Another organization is the "Nature
Society" which has identified Ilšsu
among the top 5 dangereous dams. The others
include Kayraktepe, Ermenek, Yusufeli
and Gullubag and Dini dams.
Culture and Tourism Minister Attila Koc has given assurances
that historical remains in Hasankeyf will
be removed safely and placed in a new
town to be reated. However, many experts
believe that this is not achievable. For
those who are interested, a visit to the
new town of Halfeti is recommended which
was established when the historical Halfeti
along the Euphrates was inundated upon
completion of the Bireck HEPP, which also
swallowed the historical town of Zeugma.
10 Year projection of Turkey's Electricity Generation
Capacity
In June 2006, Turkish Electricity Transmission Company
(TEIAS) published a 10 year report on
Turkey's electrical generation capacity,
identifying every operating plant, plants
to be operational every year up to 2015,
those under construction and planned by
DSI and the Electricity Market Regulatory
Authority (EMRA.) The 80 page report has
many valuable information and is an excellent
reference document. However, what is most
interesting is that the Ilšsu HEPP is not even listed as one of the planned
projects although it was stated during
the ceremonies that it would be operational
in 7 years, by 2012. The report is probably
based on the decision of DSI back in 2000
to postpone the project indefinetly due
to world wide criticism and the lack of
an updated project plan. What is also
interesting is that even if all the projects
under construction are completed, there
will be a shortage of generation by 2009,
or, considering a low demand, by 2011.
However, if the projects are not completed
on time, which is quite possible judging
from past performance, and Turkey faces
a shortage of natural gas, similiar to
the experience in early 2006, the electricity
shortages may even start earlier. In order
to prevent shortages, at least 26,298
MW capacity utilizing different fuel sources
based on high demand (13,807 MW based
on low demand) needs to be put in operation.
Hydroelectric Power Plant Developments
The Turkish government has major plans to develop its hydroelectric
power resources and to realize the country's
full hydro potential of 36,260 MW by the
year 2023, the 100th anniversary of the
Turkish Republic (present installed capacity
utilizing around 35% of potential is around
12,631MW.) The majority of the projects
have been realized by DSI, others by the
private sector. Licences to private companies
are granted by the Electricity Market
Regulatory Authority (EMRA -EPDK). Large
dams and HEPPs which can not be realized
by the private sector will continue to
be built by DSI, such as the Ilšsu dam
and HEPP. At the end of 2005, there were
155 hydroelectric power plants in operation,
41 unfinished or under construction (some
over 20 years) and plans to develop 502
sites including several under the Southeastern
Anatolia Project (GAP) , a total of 678
potential projects.
Southeastern Anatolia project (GAP)
The Southeastern Anatolian project (GAP), one of the largest
water resources development projects in
the world, is a regional development project
targeting the improvement of the socio-economic
conditions in the nine provinces and the
development of hydro resources on the
two rivers, Firat and Dicle and their
tributaries, much like the Tennesses Valley
Authority in the US. Once completed, the
total cost of the project which was initiated
in 1976 is estimated to be around $32
billion. To date $18 billion has been
spent and 11 of the proposed 19 hydroelectric
power plants, have been completed, with
a planned total installed capacity of
7,700 MW. Ilšsu HEPP will be the fourth
project on the Tigris river. GAP will
also provide irrigation for 1.82 million
hectares of land, corresponding to one
fifth of irrigable land in Turkey which
has already began providing water to the
huge Harran valley where even cotton is
now being grown.
Bilateral Cooperation Projects
Many projects are being developed under the bilateral cooperation
agreements with 6 counties, totaling 29
dams and hydroelectric power plants. Of
these, only Karkamis on Firat and Borcka
on Coruh are in operation. Those under
construction include the Deriner and Muratli
on Coruh and Ermenek on Goksu. These projects
are finaced through loans which are paid
back by the government.
Hydroelectric Power Projects Under Construction for
Decades
Ebasco services Inc (now Washington Group International),
a major design and construction company
from the US was the major contractor on
the Keban HEPP which went o line in 1975,
which is located on the Firat but is not
a part of the GAP, and Gokcekaya HEPP
on Sakarya river. During the early stages
of search for suitable hydro sites, Ebasco
started looking at the Boyabat HEPP on Kizilirmak in the early seventies.
Over the years, work was carried out on
at the Boyabat site by DSI, starting with
access roads and the tranmission site
high on a hill. During the late 90s, the
project was picked up by Dogus Enerji
to develop it as a BOT project, which
was cancelled and is now listed as one
of the investments sites by DSI. However,
after over 30 years since the original
studies, there is no firm date for the
re-start of construction and completion.
And yet, the government is plannning a
nuclear power plant near Sinop not too
far from Boyabat.
There are many hydroelectric power plants around Turkey
which were started many years ago but
not completed and now being allowed to
be taken over by the private sector. In
addition, there are several projects which
are awaiting state funds for their completion
by DSI, such as the Cine HEPP where construction
was started back in the late 80s (3)
Privatisation of Hydroelectric Power
Plants
For years, the government has been trying
to privatize the sector. So far the only
privatized hydroelectric power plant is
the Hazar I and II, located on one of
the tributaries of Firat. Last year, the
Oymapinar HEPP was also privatized when
it was tansferred to Cengiz Insaat as
part of the privatizaton of the Seydisehir
Aluminum Works. There is much discussion
on the privatization of existing plants
operated by DSI, but no action has been
taken yet. The 7 plants that were part
of the Cukurova Elektrik, Oymapinar was
one of them, were transferred to EUAS
through a controversial operation which
is still being sorted out.
Private Sector HEPPs
The first large hydroelectric power project, built under
the Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) model,
was the Birecik HEPP on the Firat, which
is now operating. Early this year, the
100 MW Yamula HEPP was put into service
after several years of development and
construction, which is owned and operated
by Ayen Energy. There are around also
hydroelectric power plants operating under
the BOT model.
Energy Policies of the European Union and Turkish
Government
Turkey is striving to become a member of the European Union
which has set the following objectives
in its energy policy: Improvement of competetiveness,
security of energy supplies and protection
of the environment . Although there has
been much criticism of the Energy Policy
of Turkey, the present government has
been studyin the European standards and
at the same time, advocating the use of
indigeneous fuels in the generation of
electrical power including renewable energy
sources.
A
timeline of hydroelectric power development
in Turkey is given in Figure 1 and a comparison
of electric power generation in Turkey
and the USA is given in Figure 2.
Figure 1 - Hydroelectric Power Plant Development Timeline and
Milestone Dates
| Year |
Event |
| 1935 |
Establishment of EIEE |
| 1936 |
On Ataturk's order, studies started
in the Euphrates Basin |
| 1938 |
Sie related stdies commenced at Keban |
| 1954 |
The State Hydraulic Works was established |
|
1961 to 1971
|
Firat development plan was issued follwed by the Lower Firat
Feasibility Study and Dicle Developmen
Plan |
| 1966 |
Work started at KEBAN HEPP |
| 1974 |
Keban HEPP went on line |
| 1976 |
Work initiated at the Southeastern Anatolia project and at Karakaya HEPP |
| 1980 |
The Lower Firat Development Plan and the Dicle Development Plan
was combined into GAP |
| 1981 |
Work started at ATATURK HEPP and Urfa Tunnels |
| 1987 |
Karakaya HEPP went on line |
| 1990 |
Water collection initiated at Ataturk Dam |
| 1992 |
Ataturk HEPP went on line |
| 1994 |
Water was conveyed to the Harran plains from Urfa Tunnel |
| 1997 |
Kralkizi and Dicle Dams started collecting water |
| 1998 |
Batman dan started collecting water |
| 1999 |
Karkamis dam and HEPP was completed |
| 2000 |
BIRECIK HEPP started production, a BOT Project with TETAS participation |
| 2006 |
Ground Breaking Ceremony at ILISU HEPP |
Figure
2 - A Comparison of the Breakdown of Electricity
Production in Turkey and the United States
by Energy Sources - 2005
|
Turkey
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resource
|
United
States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51%
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nuclear
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20%
|
|
44%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural
Gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17%
|
|
24%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydro-Electric
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |