|
The Arms Trade Resource Center (ATRC)
World Policy Institute
by
Frida BERRIGAN
The Arms Trade Resource Center (ATRC) was founded in March 1993
to conduct research, public education, and policy advocacy
on the problem of global arms proliferation.
In its first nine years in existence, the project
has established itself as a major source of independent
analysis and information for the press, members of Congress,
executive branch policymakers, and non-governmental organizations.
The project consists of four full-time staff members,
including Project Director William D. Hartung, who also
serves as the President’s Fellow at the World Policy
Institute; Deputy Director for Outreach Frida Berrigan;
Senior Research Associate Michelle Ciarrocca; and Research
Associate Dena Montague.
Ferrida
Berrigan, Research
Associate at
the World Policy Institute
The World Policy Institute, where the ATRC is based, is a
research think tank based at the
New School University in Manhattan. Primarily,
the Institute seeks to offer innovative policy proposals for public debate with
the goal of developing an internationalist consensus on
the measures needed for the management of a world market
economy, the development of a workable system of collective
security, and creation of an active transnational civil
society. Second, it seeks to promote greater public understanding
of the relationship between domestic and international
policy and to train journalists, policymakers, business
and civic leaders to be capable of understanding emerging
world problems and of reconciling the often competing
demands of globalization and national policy. Finally,
it seeks to nurture a new generation of writers and public
intellectuals committed to internationalist thinking and
to provide students in the New School community with an
opportunity to gain practical experience in policy research
and advocacy on global issues.
The Arms Trade Resource Center's 2001/2002 work is organized around
the theme of Alternatives to War Without End: Promoting
a More Balanced Approach to Preventing Terrorism. We are asking questions
like: How much of the $150 billion in new spending
on international and domestic security that has been authorized
or requested since the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks
on the Pentagon and the World Trade Center is relevant
to fighting terrorism? What systematic, multilateral efforts
are being undertaken to limit the spread of materials
needed to produce chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons?
How has the new "business of war" -- the relatively
unregulated trade in arms and illicit resources and the
ease of moving money and goods in an open global trading
system -- facilitated the activities of terror networks
like Al Qaeda? What are the long-term risks that may
result from a narrow military focus on fighting terrorism
that involves expanding the U.S. military presence in
dozens of countries and supplying U.S. arms and training
to regimes that have serious records of human rights abuses?
Due to intense interest in foreign policy issues sparked by the
September 11th attacks and the subsequent U.S.
military campaign in Afghanistan, the project had its
most successful year ever in terms of media outreach.
Project staff appeared on 120 television and radio
programs, and articles by members of the project team
or about project research appeared in over 140 newspapers,
magazines, and web-based publications.
Articles, op-eds, or letters-to-the-editor concerning
the project's work appeared in major national outlets
such as the Washington Post, The New York Times, USA Today
and Business Week, as well as on major news wires like
the Associated Press, Reuters, and the Knight-Ridder news
service; in regional and local papers such as Newsday,
the Dallas Morning News, the Boston Globe, the Baltimore
Sun, the San Diego Union-Tribune, the Tallahassee Democrat,
and the Montgomery Advertiser (Montgomery, Alabama); and
in specialized magazines and journals such as The SAIS
Review, The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, The Nation,
and the Brown Journal of International Affairs. The project
continued to expand its presence on the internet by publishing
commentaries on widely utilized sites such as the MOJOwire
(the web outlet of Mother Jones magazine), CommonDreams.org,
the Global Beat Syndicate, AlterNet, and BlackElectorate.com.
Major television appearances by project staff included interviews
on The Newshour with Jim Lehrer, Fox News Network, and
on nationally televised news programs in Brazil, South
Korea, and Canada. Radio interviews with project staff appeared
on "Newsweek on the Air" (nationally syndicated),
the BBC, Australian National Radio, National Public Radio
affiliates in Baltimore, Philadelphia, Seattle, Salt Lake
City, Santa Rosa, California, and Wisconsin (statewide),
as well as on AM talk radio programs in Buffalo, New York,
Columbia, Missouri, Columbus, Georgia, Des Moines, Iowa,
Fayetteville, North Carolina, and Grand Forks, North Dakota.
Ferrida
Berrigan (right), Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty,
Peace Women Panel at the UN on April 12, 2002
The
Bush Nuclear Policy: Making the World Safe for Nuclear
Weapons
The project's most important contribution in 2001/2002 was its
ability to provide independent analysis and stimulate
informed public discussion of the conduct of the war on
terrorism. Our May 2002 report, "About Face,"
which deals with the role of the arms lobby in shaping
the Bush administration's nuclear policy, received major
national news coverage, and has served as an important
resource for citizen's organizations and members of Congress
in the ongoing debates on the future of nuclear arms control
and disarmament.
The report has particular relevance to discussions
about whether it makes sense to move full speed ahead
with a multi-billion dollar missile defense system and
develop a new generation of nuclear weapons at a time
when the greatest threats to U.S. security are posed by
low-tech, highly destructive terror attacks.
It also questions the wisdom of a policy based
on undermining multilateral treaties designed to stem
the spread of weapons of mass destruction while pursuing
military-technical solutions to the problem of nuclear
proliferation that will provide little if any effective
protection against these deadly weapons.
In
the report, Project Director William D. Hartung tries
to respond to questions like: How did it happen that within
less than a year of taking office, the Bush administration
reversed the nuclear arms policy of the preceding three
Presidents? How did United States policy abruptly shift
from seeking to reduce U.S. reliance on nuclear weapons
to making the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons
a central component of U.S. strategy? How did nuclear
"war-fighting" doctrine, rejected by Presidents
Reagan, Bush and Clinton, become the centerpiece of the
new administration's official nuclear weapons policy?
The
answer, he found, lies with the undue influence exercised
upon the Bush administration by former defense industry
executives, many of whom are now in policy-making positions
at the White House and the Pentagon, the defense contracting
companies they once ran, and a small circle of conservative
ideologues at think tanks funded by those companies. The
Bush nuclear doctrine makes no sense as a defense policy,
but it is a perfect match for the material and ideological
"needs" of major administration supporters.
More
than any administration in recent memory, the Bush administration
has relied upon individuals with close professional and
financial connections to the arms industry to fill top
foreign policy and national security positions. Just as
Vice President Dick Cheney's reliance on energy industry
executives to draft a national energy policy has drawn
widespread criticism, the role of the arms lobby in shaping
the Bush administration's nuclear plans demands far greater
public scrutiny. This time, the stakes are far higher.
To
learn more about the work of the World Policy Institute's
Arms Trade Resource Center visit the website www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms
World Policy Institute
66 Fifth Ave., 9th Floor
New York, NY 10011
ph 212.229.5808 x112
fax 212.229.5579
|