![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
EVERYTHING SHOULD BE UNDER
THE SUN |
Several reports about FM-2030
published last July credit the New School for his pioneering classes
on the future. Is that when you first met? FM founded a Futurism department
at the New School in the mid nineteen-seventies. My recollection is
that it was successful for a number of semesters before he decided to
move to California and teach at the UCLA Extension School. Today there are people who are
doing courses here at the university on Extra-Terrestrials and Science,
talking about a number of future-wide topics but it is not futurism
persay. I suspect there aren’t many people around who are qualifed
to teach an entire semester on the subject. When you first met FM-2030,
what was the name he used at that time? Well, I knew FM-2030 before when
he was FM-2030. He was F.M. Esfandiary. We met here at the New School,
when I began teaching in the Fall 1976. Amazingly, someone has pointed
out, next year will be 25 years that I have been teaching here at the
university. One of the things that you can do, when you are teaching
is take a free course. And I happened to look in the bulletin, and FM
was beginning a series either called “Futuristics” or “Futurology”. What attracted you in particular
to the description of the seminar in the bulletin? I have had a lifelong interest
in magic, religion, psychology, philosophy and the future. It was just
an interestingly worded course that caught my eye. We had a cup of soup
after the first class and became instant friends. He really was an extraordinary
teacher with great charisma and put together a lot of things had been
bits and pieces in my mind about the future. To me, he really opened
my mind and thinking about where we will all spend the rest of our lives.
From the very first class,
what was the most outstanding idea about the future that impressed you?
Well, at time, he was in the
process of crating the whole series on TELESPHERES various future senarios
in which our world will change dramatically. My particular interest
was the personal immortality question. I'm just reading "Ageless
Body Timeless Mind" by Deepak Chopra (Harmony Books), and there
is a very curious way in which Deepak Chopra reminds me of FM. In the
final chapters of the book he talks about, "The Science of Longevity
and Breaking the Spell of Mortality". These are favorite themes
of FM's, and I know they were many people who were inspired by him including
Alvin Toffler, in his famous book "Future Shock" which in
the 1970's opened the whole field for the public. I recalled FM, telling
me that Toffler called him on a number of occasions for information
when he was putting his book together. FM had a charisma and presence.
It always strikes me as a tremendously arrogant act for a teacher to
stand up with a bunch of ideas and expect to hold people's attention
week after week. He could do it. And he obviously enjoyed it. Part of
what I have learned in my own teaching was from him. In my own teaching
I put a lot of humor and funnies. Curiously he used some funnies but
he was a much better audience. He loved one liners, play on words and
funny stuff. And he loved magic. My mentalism; the levitations, the
key bending and mind reading, he found all that very fascinating. We
had discussions on major areas. Part of my background involved studying for the Roman Catholic
Priesthood. He was full blown atheist. We had a big gulf in this area
between us. I never felt there was a discrepancy whether we live to
be a 100, a 150 or beyond in the divine plan of human history. I don't see any problem with
belief in the existence of God, and our human potential intelligent
creatures who have demonstrated our ability to accomplish fantastic
visions and will continue to do so in the future. I have been doing tours at the
American Museum of Natural History for the past 10 years. A couple years
ago, we had a wonderful film on the IMAX 60 foot screen. It was called,
"The Cosmic Voyage" and it had to do with the future, going
out to space and coming into inner space. He and Flora (Schnall) came
as my guests. Yes he had a "nostalgia for the future" but
FM was very tuned into the present and the joy and playfulness of being
alive at the moment. One learned that from him as well... And also playfulness...
I play all the time. I think we recognized in each other that
quality of having fun, being exhuberant during the time we are alive
and well. When you say, "I play
all the time", what do you mean? Well, I play with the ideas,
I play with my life, I play with what I enjoy doing... Can you give an example? Sure. My kids show; which I just
performed at the American Museum of Natural History to an audience about150
children... Its called; "Dr. Quacksalver T. Can-Do's
Super Magic Show." A show of fun,
magic, and motivational ideas. When you grow up you can do many things...
Anything you can conceive and believe you can achieve. In the show I just play on words
and ideas and with magic as well. I saw in FM the awareness that this
playfulness is the basis of all creativity. A synonym for intelligence
is creativity and to be playful. And for many reasons most grownups
aren't playful. They see it as silliness or a waste of time but to me
it is the well stream of beinf a human being. So we often had discussions
about that. He also had --I would certainly say-- radical views in terms of relationships.
I think for some people that was very difficult to hear it but he believed
in it and lived it. Did you have any difficulty
to understand him in terms of his relationship concept? As a Christian a number of things
he talked about would have the Vatican lock him up in 20 minutes, although
they reflect a life style which is very much around us in many people'
lives. When we talk in America about the family, it is sacrosanct subject.
I found very interesting that one of the main themes about the Republican
and Democratic convention was the theme of the family. In fact we know
that a number of prominent Republicans and Democrats are hardly family-oriented
but obviously hypocritical in what they espouse publically. I think he pointed out things
he deeply felt but that shocked many conventional people. I think he
was a provocateur, but was a person who did so in a gentle manner. It
was question of style and content. This was one of the major features
and I came to admire about the guy. We didn't see each other all the
time when he moved to Florida or when he was in California but we kept
in touch. He always called me when he was in town. We got together and
had some of his much loved vegetarian food. Usually
after one of these "healthy" dinners I would need a bowl of
cereal when I got home to feel I actually had dinner. What was the most strong impression
you can remember reading of his cyronic-suspension? The moment is still fresh in
my memory. I was very touched when I was in my morning ritual, getting
the New York Times, having a cup of coffee, and organizing the day
and writing down what I was up to... I just open the paper up
and saw his obituary, I was stunned. This was last July... After conversations with mutual
friends and the celebration of his life at St. Peters Church in mid-town.
I had a dream which was incredible vivid which I told to my dear friend
Dr. Gerard Sunnen, who is a phychiatrist. In my dream; I was in my apartment
on the upper-west side, was thinking about FM, and decided to go to
see him in the capsule in the South West. I was going to visit him as
perhaps one would want to visit the grave side of a friend. I got in
my car, drove over the George Washington Bridge, and of course there
I was. It was a futuristic looking large white building somewhat like
Lucent technologies in New Jersey, a building of
power and majesty, a cathedral of technology. I went in, identifed myself,
asked to see FM's capsule. I saw an enormous room full with many many capsules. A guy
came with a golf-car, picked me up, and we started driving through rows
and rows of containers. When we got to the container where FM was there
was a little glass cut out in the front of the top and I could see his
face. The driver said he would be back, and left in the golf-cart. He knew the answer... It is amazing... When you
left alone face to face there, what did you feel or did you talk with
him? Yes, we talked. That was the next part of the dream. There were lights and little bubbles coming up in front of his face... I was looking up and I was saying a prayer for him, a pray to God to the repose of his soul from my tradition as a Christian and suddenly he opened his eyes, similed and looked at me. I was just dumbstruck and couldn't beleve what I was seeing. And he said: -Well, it's good to see you Gabriel. I am glad you came. I just was speechless. I was frozen... And I didn't understand how could this be. I think, the first thing I said was: -I
thought you were dead. And he laughed. In the way we
laughed together many times. And I said: He said: He seemed angry about his fate.
It was like an accident being hit by a bus. We can now replace vital
organs like hearts, lungs and livers but we have not yet solved the
healing of the pancreas... He said: And I always said: And he laughed again and said: Again, I couldn't talk. I was both shocked and incredibly curious. What was he logically talking about? He said it again: -Humanity always thought about
it as this or that. It is very much like the question of life in outer
space. It is or it isn't. But there is a third option which we cannot
see or understand in this life. The conciousness we experience after
death is a glorious surprise! I remember I was stumbling for words... being very happy to see him alive as we're talking but still fearful... what is going on here? And he said to me: There
was another empty capsule about five feet away from his. He said: I said: And he laughed again and said: Later when I told this dream
to my friend he suggested that, I simply ask FM what it was he saw.
You didn't have to die to know... My curiosity was overwhelming but
it wasn't enough at the moment to know the answer. And I just remember sitting in
the gulf-cart, not that we said goodbye to eachother, and than simply
puttering back to the main office where I first came into the building. And I woke up. He knew the answer. He was willing to share it with me. But
I wasn't willing to die to find out what he knew. I can't remember another dream
that was that vivid and had that much detail. I've tried to return to
the dream again but it's never happened. This is
at least a chance... You read that he was suspended
in the New York Times. What did you recall when reading of his cryonic
suspension? I remember saying to him, at some point, "Look F.M. The vast majority of the scientific community say that while cryonic suspension may be possible in the future it is impossible today. And FM replied, " I understand that-- , yes, if you die, you will buried six feed under, there is no chance whatsoever. This is at least a chance." These are almost his exact words. He did not have any illusions about the reality of the process actually working today, but perhaps some new insight would make this vision come true. ... He is still in me in many ways
I miss him terriblly, he deeply influenced my life in a positive, hopeful
sense. Since you first met F.M.,
which of his visions/hypothesis have been realized and are accessible
today? A central concept which we gleaned from Thomas Edison, ...telephone, using 'tele' as a prefix. He took and expanded this into various areas of ultimate communication. One of the times when he was working on a book I asked him a question and he said that he had a bunch of that material at home. "You must be constantly on top of this, constantly reading, constantly making phone calls... It was a revelation that he didn't just simply sit in his apartment and write. He was drawing in sources and seeing where they could be extended into the future, to make real his impulse as a normative planner. There have been many people who
have made extraordinary predictions of the future. Although
he always tried to base it on what was available now, and project
100 years, 500 years or even beyond. It always intrigued
me that, he was always oriented in this direction. To me it was very
priestly. He was very passionate about a world that he had never seen
yet believed in it and certainly stimulated others to believe in. To
me this is a priestly vision that he had. And he laughed when I once
called him "Father F.M."
Despite this he was an atheist! There was a spiritual quality about him a man with absolute confidence in a world he never saw, a world of hope, abundance, optimism, the kind of things that he spoke about it and saw in the future. So, to me there was a parallel, he was truly passionate and driven by it. ...This was part of his legacy and wanting to leave his thoughts and feelings and deep beliefs in about the future. But he certainly helped me as one of the my great teachers in not only as a futurist but as a man, and a way to live and represent ideas. And that's why I try to do here at the New School. I have taught fourteen different subjects not just Sign Language. And I always try to realize, especially with the sign language, my students are going to have an impression of the New School and deaf people and sign language... It is all up to me to give them a positive view of all these. We are all broadcast stations. We're speaking verbally and non-verbally all the time. I think, people don't really take in power of the words and influence for good they can have in their worlds. I've got to get class."Have
Fun, Do Good and Be Happy", as Dr. Can-Do would say. Would you like to add anything? A final story I must tell...
The show I mention to you that I did with the children at the American
Museum of Natural History. At the end of the show, a little girl, came
down middle of the isle, standing in front of the stage with her hand
raised and she said; Dr. Cando, I need help!
I crouched down, seeing she just was so anxious to talk. Jump cut back a moment. In the bulletin announcing the
show at the museum, I wrote PS: "Please, don't forget to bring
your imagination..." She raised her hand and said: I said: I mean, she took
my words as a fun thing about imagination very seriously and was concerned
that she didn't have it with her that day. A Metropolitan Diary moment
the New York Times. There is a power that you have as a performer figure,
as a teacher, as a lawyer, as a medical figure, as a religious figure
that touch people enormously. Dr. Cando closes the show with a chart
made up of the three rules for cool life: Have fun, Do good and Be Happy.
And I have the kids say that out loud. Lots of times we grownups forget
that: HAVE FUN, DO GOOD
and BE HAPPY. © Bircan Unver, New York, December 2000. |
|
This issue is dedicated to contemporary
Turkish artist
Erol AKYAVAŞ. |
|
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Links and Logos are updated in this page in August 2015.